What’s the difference between the Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 and the Glock 43? The Bodyguard 2.0 is smaller and lighter, making it easy to conceal, while the Glock 43 offers a slightly larger grip and higher magazine capacity for better control and follow-up shots.
Both pistols deliver dependable performance, but their design priorities differ. The Bodyguard 2.0 excels in maximum concealability for deep carry or backup roles. The Glock 43 strikes a balance between compact size and shootability, appealing to those who want slim lines without sacrificing handling.
Your choice depends on what matters more—ultimate discretion or a bit more grip and capacity. Evaluate your carry method, hand size, and confidence in recoil control to decide which one earns a spot in your holster.
- Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 is ideal for ultra-lightweight, deep concealment with its compact size, .380 ACP chambering, and integrated Crimson Trace laser sight.
- Glock 43 offers greater stopping power with its 9mm caliber, ergonomic grip, and striker-fired trigger system for faster follow-up shots.
- The Bodyguard prioritizes portability and discretion, while the Glock excels in versatility and performance under diverse conditions.
- Trigger systems differ: the Bodyguard's DAO mechanism enhances safety but requires deliberate control; the Glock’s short-reset trigger supports quicker engagements.
- Both models support concealed carry effectively, but holster selection (IWB, OWB, appendix) plays a key role in comfort and accessibility based on user preferences.
- Choose the Bodyguard for casual carriers seeking minimal bulk or the Glock for active trainers needing reliability and customization options.
Bodyguard 2.0 vs Glock 43 — Which is the Best Gun?
Choosing between the Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 and Glock 43 depends on your specific needs, preferences, and intended use cases. Both models excel in different areas, making them suitable for distinct user profiles.
| Feature | Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 | Glock 43 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight (unloaded) | ~12 oz | ~17.99 oz |
| Caliber | .380 ACP | 9mm Luger |
| Barrel Length | 2.75" | 3.41" |
| Magazine Capacity | 6+1 | 6+1 (upgradable) |
| Trigger System | DAO (double-action only) | Striker-fired |
| Integrated Laser | Yes (Crimson Trace) | No |
| Ideal Use | Deep concealment, backup | Concealed carry, versatile self-defense |
Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0: Compact Discretion
The Bodyguard 2.0 offers a lightweight polymer frame with an integrated Crimson Trace laser sight, ideal for deep concealment or backup carry scenarios.
Weighing just 14.4 ounces unloaded, it fits easily into IWB (inside-the-waistband) holsters or pocket holsters without adding bulk. Its double-action-only trigger system enhances safety during concealed carry but may require more deliberate trigger control during rapid fire.
With its .380 ACP chambering, recoil remains manageable even for newer shooters or those with smaller hands. But, the trade-off is reduced stopping power compared to larger calibers like 9mm. The six-round magazine capacity aligns well with its compact design but limits extended engagements unless you carry spare magazines.
This model suits individuals prioritizing maximum portability and discretion over higher-caliber performance—such as civilians seeking an everyday concealed carry option or law enforcement officers needing a reliable backup firearm.
Glock 43: Versatile Performance
The Glock 43 delivers robust reliability in a slimline single-stack design chambered in 9mm Luger. With a slightly heavier weight of approximately 17.99 ounces unloaded, it balances better during sustained shooting sessions while still being easy to conceal using IWB or appendix-carry holsters like Alien Gear Holsters made from Boltaron material.
Its short-reset striker-fired trigger promotes faster follow-up shots compared to DAO systems, appealing to competitive shooters and those who train regularly at the range. The standard six-round magazine can be upgraded with aftermarket extensions for increased capacity without compromising ergonomics.
The Glock’s proven track record makes it popular among military units and law enforcement agencies worldwide due to its durability under adverse conditions. If you're looking for a versatile handgun capable of handling both self-defense and training scenarios effectively, this model stands out.
Key Considerations
-
Concealability: Choose the Bodyguard if ultra-lightweight portability matters most; opt for the Glock if slightly larger dimensions are acceptable.
-
Caliber Preference: Select the Bodyguard for lower-recoil .380 ACP; pick the Glock for greater stopping power with 9mm.
-
Trigger System: Go with the Bodyguard's DAO mechanism if safety under stress is critical; prefer the Glock's striker-fired system for quicker follow-ups.
-
Customization Potential: The Glock supports extensive aftermarket upgrades including sights, triggers, and magazine extensions; customization options are limited on the Bodyguard.
-
Use Case: For casual carriers prioritizing comfort and ease of concealment, lean toward the Bodyguard; active trainers or professionals requiring versatility should consider the Glock.
Evaluate these factors based on your lifestyle and experience level before deciding which firearm aligns best with your personal defense strategy.
Key Specs Breakdown
Design & Ergonomics
The Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 and Glock 43 both prioritize compactness, but their designs cater to different preferences. The Bodyguard 2.0 features a slim polymer frame with an integrated Crimson Trace laser sight, enhancing low-light targeting for concealed carry users. Its textured grip provides adequate control even though its smaller size, though some may find it less comfortable during extended shooting sessions.
The Glock 43 offers a slightly larger profile with a more ergonomic grip angle that aligns naturally in your hand. Its polymer frame is robust yet lightweight, designed for durability under repeated use.
The aggressive texturing on the grip ensures stability even in wet conditions, making it suitable for law enforcement or competitive shooters who demand reliability in high-stress scenarios.
Caliber & Barrel Length
The Bodyguard 2.0 is chambered in .380 ACP, offering manageable recoil and sufficient stopping power for close-range self-defense situations. Its barrel length measures 2.75 inches, contributing to its ultra-compact design ideal for deep concealment inside IWB or appendix holsters.
In contrast, the Glock 43 uses the widely preferred 9mm Luger caliber, delivering greater ballistic performance and versatility across defensive and training applications. With a barrel length of 3.41 inches, it achieves improved accuracy over longer distances while maintaining easy portability for concealed carry enthusiasts or off-duty officers using OWB or chest rigs.
Capacity & Magazine Options
Magazine capacity varies significantly between these models. The Bodyguard 2.0 includes a standard six-round magazine plus one in the chamber, which suits civilian carriers prioritizing minimal bulk over firepower. Extended magazines are limited but available through aftermarket suppliers.
The Glock 43 also holds six rounds by default but benefits from extensive aftermarket support offering higher-capacity options like eight- or ten-round magazines from brands such as Magpul or Shield Arms. This flexibility appeals to those seeking enhanced readiness without compromising concealability.
Trigger Performance & Safety Features
Trigger systems differ notably between these pistols. The Bodyguard 2.0 employs a double-action-only (DAO) trigger with a long pull that reduces accidental discharge risks but requires deliberate effort to fire accurately under stress—a feature appreciated by new gun owners prioritizing safety.
The Glock 43 utilizes Glock’s Safe Action system with consistent trigger pull weight and shorter reset distance compared to DAO triggers. This setup allows faster follow-up shots and precise control during rapid engagements, appealing to experienced shooters or professionals needing reliable performance under pressure.
Both models integrate passive safeties; but, only the Bodyguard includes an external manual thumb safety as an additional layer of protection against unintended firing during concealed carry use cases like pocket holsters or purse storage setups where trigger access might be compromised without proper coverage.
Shooting Performance in the Field
Accuracy & Grouping
The Bodyguard 2.0 and Glock 43 exhibit distinct accuracy characteristics due to their design and caliber differences.
The Bodyguard, chambered in .380 ACP, offers consistent accuracy at close ranges (7-10 yards), which aligns with its intended role as a deep-concealment firearm for self-defense scenarios. Its integrated laser sight enhances precision during low-light conditions or high-stress situations but may require regular calibration to maintain alignment.
The Glock 43, chambered in 9mm Luger, delivers tighter groupings at extended distances (15-25 yards) compared to the Bodyguard. Its longer barrel length of 3.41 inches improves muzzle velocity and ballistic performance, making it more suitable for range training or duty use.
Competitive shooters or law enforcement officers might find the Glock’s crisp trigger reset advantageous for follow-up shots when engaging multiple targets.
Reliability & Durability
Both firearms demonstrate reliable operation under standard conditions, though they cater to different priorities. The Bodyguard’s double-action-only (DAO) trigger system reduces accidental discharges but can result in slower shot placement during rapid fire. It performs well with factory-loaded ammunition but may encounter cycling issues with certain hollow-point rounds if not properly maintained.
The Glock 43 excels in reliability across diverse environments due to its striker-fired mechanism and robust polymer frame construction. Law enforcement agencies often favor Glocks for their proven track record under adverse conditions like extreme temperatures or exposure to dirt and moisture.
Also, aftermarket support allows you to enhance durability further by upgrading components such as recoil springs or guide rods.
Recoil and Handling for Different Use Cases
Recoil management varies significantly between these models because of their calibers and weight distribution. The Bodyguard’s lightweight frame (12 ounces unloaded) results in noticeable felt recoil even though the lower power of .380 ACP rounds. This makes it manageable for new gun owners practicing basic drills but less ideal for extended sessions at the range.
In contrast, the Glock 43 balances moderate recoil with its heavier build (17.99 ounces unloaded). Its ergonomic grip provides better control during rapid strings of fire, benefiting competitive shooters or those training regularly on dynamic courses of fire.
For concealed carry users employing IWB holsters, both pistols offer comfortable options; but, appendix carriers may prefer the slimmer profile of the Bodyguard over the slightly bulkier Glock 43 configuration.
Concealed Carry & Practical Use
Comfort for Daily Carry
The Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 and Glock 43 both prioritize comfort, but their designs cater to different carry preferences. The Bodyguard 2.0, weighing just 12 ounces unloaded, offers a slim profile ideal for deep concealment.
Its lightweight polymer frame reduces fatigue during extended wear, making it suitable for users prioritizing discretion and minimal bulk.
The Glock 43, at 17.99 ounces unloaded, provides a slightly heavier yet balanced feel that enhances stability during movement. While its larger grip may print more under tighter clothing compared to the Bodyguard, it fits comfortably in most OWB (outside-the-waistband) or IWB holsters designed for compact pistols.
Both firearms accommodate various body types and carry positions effectively. But, if you value maximum portability with less noticeable weight, the Bodyguard stands out; whereas the Glock’s ergonomic design suits those who can manage slightly more heft without compromising all-day comfort.
Draw Speed & Accessibility
Quick access is critical in self-defense scenarios, and both models excel in this area depending on your setup. The Bodyguard 2.0 features a smaller grip surface which may require deliberate hand placement during the draw but allows faster presentation from concealed positions like pocket or ankle holsters due to its compact size.
The Glock 43 benefits from an extended beavertail and textured grip panels that promote a firm purchase upon drawing from standard IWB or appendix rigs. Its Safe Action trigger system eliminates external safeties that could slow deployment under stress while maintaining safety through internal mechanisms.
If rapid follow-up shots are part of your training routine or professional requirements, the Glock's intuitive controls provide an edge over the DAO-triggered Bodyguard by reducing reset time between engagements.
Choose based on your proficiency level: new shooters might prefer the simplicity of the Bodyguard’s manual thumb safety as an added precaution during draws; experienced carriers often favor the streamlined operation of the Glock for high-pressure situations requiring split-second decisions.
Holster Recommendations
Selecting the right holster enhances comfort, accessibility, and safety for concealed carry. Both the Bodyguard 2.0 and Glock 43 benefit from a range of holster styles suited to different carry preferences.
OWB, IWB, Appendix, Chest & Other Options
OWB (Outside-the-Waistband): OWB holsters provide easy access and are ideal for open carry or range use. For the Glock 43, consider Boltaron-made options like Alien Gear Cloak Mod OWB holsters that offer durability and retention. The Bodyguard 2.0 pairs well with compact polymer OWB designs for minimal bulk.
IWB (Inside-the-Waistband): IWB holsters maximize concealment under clothing. Slim-profile models work best for both pistols due to their compact frames. Look for adjustable cant and ride height features to improve draw speed and comfort during extended wear.
Appendix Carry: Appendix-specific holsters prioritize deep concealment in front-carry positions. The Bodyguard’s slim design excels here, while the Glock benefits from ergonomic appendix rigs with integrated claw attachments to reduce printing.
Chest Rigs: Chest-mounted options suit outdoor activities or tactical scenarios where waistline carry isn’t practical. Modular chest rigs accommodate both models securely while ensuring quick access when seated or wearing heavy gear.
Will a Bodyguard 2.0 fit in a Glock 43 Holster or Viceversa?
No, the Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 will not fit in a Glock 43 holster, and the Glock 43 won’t fit in a Bodyguard 2.0 holster either.
The Bodyguard 2.0 is smaller overall—with a slimmer frame and shorter barrel—compared to the Glock 43. These differences in size, shape, and trigger guard design mean the fit will be loose or misaligned. For proper retention and safe carry, use a holster made specifically for each firearm.
Final Thoughts — Which One Should You Choose?
Choosing between the Bodyguard 2.0 and Glock 43 eventually comes down to your personal needs and priorities. If you value lightweight portability, deep concealment, and features like an integrated laser sight, the Bodyguard may align better with your lifestyle.
On the other hand, if you're looking for a versatile firearm with greater stopping power, ergonomic handling, and extensive aftermarket options, the Glock 43 stands out as a reliable choice.
Take time to assess factors like comfort, caliber preference, intended use case, and holster compatibility. Whether you're new to concealed carry or an experienced shooter seeking a dependable sidearm, selecting the right pistol ensures confidence in both performance and safety.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What are the main differences between the Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 and Glock 43?
The Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 is lighter, slimmer, and chambered in .380 ACP with an integrated laser sight, making it ideal for deep concealment. The Glock 43 is slightly larger, chambered in 9mm Luger, offering better ballistic performance and versatility for training or self-defense.
2. Which pistol is better for beginners?
The Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 is often recommended for beginners due to its lightweight design, manageable recoil, and external manual safety that adds an extra layer of protection during concealed carry.
3. Is the Glock 43 suitable for daily concealed carry?
Yes, the Glock 43 is a great option for daily concealed carry thanks to its compact size, ergonomic grip, reliable Safe Action trigger system, and moderate weight that balances stability with comfort.
4. Does the Bodyguard’s integrated laser sight improve accuracy?
Yes, the integrated laser sight on the Bodyguard enhances close-range accuracy by providing a clear aiming point in low-light conditions or high-stress situations.
5. Can I customize either firearm?
Both firearms offer customization options; however, the Glock 43 has more extensive aftermarket support for accessories like extended magazines, upgraded sights, and holsters compared to the Bodyguard.
6. Which gun has less recoil?
The Smith & Wesson Bodyguard produces less felt recoil due to its .380 ACP caliber and lightweight frame, making it easier to handle for new shooters or those sensitive to recoil.
7. How does magazine capacity compare between these pistols?
Both pistols have a standard magazine capacity of six rounds; however, aftermarket extensions are widely available for the Glock 43 to increase capacity if needed.
8. Are there specific holster recommendations for these guns?
For deep concealment of the Bodyguard, pocket or appendix-specific holsters work well. For the Glock 43, OWB (Outside-the-Waistband) or IWB (Inside-the-Waistband) holsters provide excellent accessibility while maintaining comfort.
9. Which pistol offers faster draw speed?
The compact size of the Bodyguard allows quick presentation from concealed positions like pockets or appendix carry setups. However, experienced carriers may find faster deployment with the Glock's ergonomic design and streamlined Safe Action trigger system.
10. Should I choose based on caliber preference alone?
Caliber should be one factor among many when choosing a pistol. Consider other aspects such as concealability, ergonomics, shooting experience level, intended use case (e.g., self-defense vs training), and personal comfort before deciding.