What’s the difference between the Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 and the Glock 42? The Bodyguard 2.0 offers a slimmer frame with integrated laser options and a double-action trigger, while the Glock 42 delivers a smoother trigger pull and a proven track record in .380 ACP reliability.
Both pistols are purpose-built for deep concealment and close-range defense. The Bodyguard suits those who want a built-in laser and lower profile. The Glock 42 appeals to shooters who prioritize simplicity, shootability, and brand consistency.
Your choice comes down to what you value most—feature-packed design or streamlined function. Either way, both deliver on concealment and everyday practicality.
Key Takeaways
- The Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 and Glock 42 are both excellent options for concealed carry, but they cater to different priorities such as concealability, shootability, and customization.
- The Bodyguard 2.0 excels in maximum portability with its slim profile, lightweight design, and integrated Crimson Trace laser sight for enhanced target acquisition in low-light conditions.
- The Glock 42 offers superior reliability, smoother trigger performance, and better handling during extended shooting sessions due to its ergonomic grip and slightly larger size.
- Both pistols are chambered in .380 ACP, delivering manageable recoil suitable for new shooters or those prioritizing quick follow-up shots under stress.
- Your choice should align with your personal defense goals, daily carry preferences, and training needs to ensure confidence in real-world scenarios.
Similarities Between Bodyguard 2.0 vs Glock 42
Both the Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 and the Glock 42 are purpose-built micro-compact 9mm/.380-class carry pistols designed for deep concealment and everyday reliability. They share the same core mission: minimal footprint, simple controls, and a focus on safe, dependable defensive performance in a package that disappears under clothing.
Both emphasize snag-free profiles, easy takedown for cleaning, and ergonomics tuned for one- or two-handed defensive use from close range. Each has a strong aftermarket for holsters and accessories tailored to micro carry, and training on draw, presentation, and close-range accuracy transfers directly between them.
In short: they’re small carry tools built for the same job—reliable, concealable, and straightforward to operate—so if you’re comfortable with one, the other will feel familiar in handling and purpose.
Glock 42 or Bodyguard 2.0: Which Gun is Better for You?
Choosing between the Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 and Glock 42 depends on your specific needs, preferences, and intended use cases. Both pistols excel in concealed carry scenarios but cater to different priorities.
| Feature | Bodyguard 2.0 | Glock 42 |
|---|---|---|
| Weight (unloaded) | ~12 oz | ~13.8 oz |
| Concealability | Slim, excellent for deep concealment | Compact, good balance of concealment and control |
| Capacity | 6+1 | 6+1, expandable with extensions |
| Trigger | DAO, heavier pull | Lighter, smoother pull |
| Special Features | Integrated Crimson Trace laser | Customizable, reliable striker-fired |
| Ideal Use | Maximum concealability, backup carry | Balanced shootability, comfort, training |
Bodyguard 2.0: Ideal for Maximum Concealability
The Bodyguard 2.0 offers exceptional concealment due to its slim profile and lightweight design (12 oz unloaded). Its integrated Crimson Trace laser sight enhances target acquisition in low-light conditions, making it suitable for personal defense situations where speed matters. Chambered in .380 ACP, it delivers manageable recoil, which benefits newer shooters or those with smaller hands.
This pistol fits well with IWB (inside-the-waistband) holsters like Alien Gear's models, ensuring secure carry without printing under light clothing. But, its double-action-only trigger pull may feel heavier compared to striker-fired options like the Glock 42.
Glock 42: Balanced Performance and Reliability
The Glock 42 stands out for its reliability and ease of operation. Weighing slightly more at 13.76 oz unloaded, it remains compact while offering a smoother trigger pull and consistent performance across various shooting conditions. Also chambered in .380 ACP, this firearm balances controllable recoil with improved accuracy during follow-up shots.
Its compatibility with a wide range of aftermarket parts allows customization for competitive shooters or advanced users seeking enhanced ergonomics or sights. The Glock’s larger grip surface provides better control during extended range sessions but may compromise deep concealment under tighter clothing.
Key Considerations
-
If maximum portability is your priority, the Bodyguard 2.0 excels.
-
For superior shootability and upgrade potential, the Glock 42 takes the lead.
-
Evaluate holster options carefully; both models pair well with OWB or appendix rigs depending on your preferred carry style.
Your decision should align with your comfort level during training drills and daily wear requirements.
Key Specs Breakdown Glock 42 vs Bodyguard 2.0
Design & Ergonomics
The Bodyguard 2.0 and Glock 42 differ significantly in design, catering to distinct user preferences. The Bodyguard 2.0 features a slim polymer frame with an integrated Crimson Trace laser sight, enhancing target acquisition for newer shooters or low-light scenarios. Its compact profile measures 5.25 inches in overall length and weighs just 14.4 ounces unloaded, making it highly concealable for IWB (inside-the-waistband) or appendix carry.
The Glock 42 offers a slightly larger grip surface and smoother contours, improving control during rapid fire or extended range sessions.
At 5.94 inches long and weighing 13.76 ounces unloaded, it balances portability with shootability, appealing to those prioritizing comfort during training or daily wear. Both models support holster compatibility across OWB (outside-the-waistband), IWB, and pocket-carry options like Alien Gear Holsters.
Caliber & Barrel Length
Chambered in .380 ACP, both pistols deliver manageable recoil suitable for new gun owners or experienced concealed carriers seeking quick follow-up shots under stress. The Bodyguard 2.0 incorporates a shorter barrel at 2.75 inches, emphasizing concealability over velocity while maintaining sufficient accuracy within self-defense distances of up to seven yards.
The Glock 42's longer barrel measures three inches, offering marginally higher muzzle velocity and improved ballistic performance compared to the Bodyguard 2.0 when using defensive ammunition such as Hornady Critical Defense or Federal HST rounds.
While both calibers perform well in close-quarters engagements, the slight edge in terminal ballistics makes the Glock more versatile for mixed-use scenarios like home defense or vehicle carry.
Capacity & Magazine Options
Magazine capacity influences reload frequency during high-stress situations or extended practice drills at the range. The Bodyguard 2.0 includes a six-round magazine plus one chambered round for a total capacity of seven rounds—adequate for most civilian defensive encounters but limited compared to larger handguns.
The Glock 42 also ships with six-round magazines but benefits from aftermarket extensions that increase capacity by one to two rounds without compromising reliability or concealment potential. This flexibility appeals to competitive shooters practicing timed drills where additional rounds reduce reload interruptions while still fitting snugly into standard IWB holsters.
Trigger Performance & Safety Features
Trigger mechanics impact shot placement consistency and user confidence under pressure. The Bodyguard 2.0 employs a double-action-only (DAO) trigger system with an approximate pull weight of nine pounds, providing deliberate resistance that minimizes accidental discharges but may challenge precision shooting without extensive practice.
In contrast, the Glock Safe Action System combines a lighter five-and-a-half-pound trigger pull with internal safeties designed to prevent unintentional firing if dropped—a feature valued by law enforcement professionals and civilians alike for its balance between safety and responsiveness during dynamic movements or stressful conditions.
Both models integrate external controls tailored toward their intended audiences: the manual thumb safety on the Bodyguard enhances peace of mind for cautious users carrying chambered rounds; meanwhile, the absence of external safeties on the Glock streamlines operation speed critical in defensive scenarios requiring split-second reactions.
Shooting Performance in the Field
Accuracy & Grouping
The Bodyguard 2.0 and Glock 42 deliver distinct accuracy profiles suited to different scenarios. The Bodyguard 2.0, with its integrated laser sight, enhances precision during low-light conditions or rapid target acquisition at close ranges under 10 yards.
This feature benefits newer shooters or those prioritizing personal defense in confined spaces like homes or vehicles. But, its heavier double-action-only (DAO) trigger can affect shot placement consistency for some users, especially during extended range sessions.
The Glock 42 offers tighter groupings at distances up to 15 yards due to its longer barrel and lighter trigger pull. Competitive shooters and experienced users often appreciate this advantage when engaging targets beyond typical self-defense ranges.
Its minimal sight radius may require aftermarket upgrades, such as fiber-optic sights, for improved performance in dynamic shooting drills or outdoor environments.
Reliability & Durability
Both models exhibit reliability but cater to different use cases. The Bodyguard 2.0’s DAO system reduces the likelihood of accidental discharges, making it a dependable choice for concealed carry in high-stress situations where safety is paramount. Its polymer frame resists corrosion and wear from daily carry but may show slight signs of finish degradation after prolonged exposure to sweat or holster friction.
The Glock 42 excels in long-term durability with its Tenifer-treated slide and robust internal components designed for sustained use across thousands of rounds without significant maintenance issues. Law enforcement officers or frequent range-goers often favor this model for its proven track record under rigorous conditions, including adverse weather and dirt exposure.
Recoil and Handling for Different Use Cases
Recoil management differs significantly between these pistols due to their design characteristics.
The Bodyguard 2.0 generates more felt recoil because of its lightweight build and compact grip profile, which can challenge control during rapid-fire sequences or follow-up shots for users with larger hands. Adding an extended magazine baseplate improves handling slightly by providing additional surface area for grip stability.
In contrast, the Glock 42 delivers softer recoil impulses thanks to its marginally larger size and ergonomic grip angle that promotes natural wrist alignment during firing cycles.
This makes it suitable for extended training sessions or defensive scenarios requiring quick successive shots without sacrificing accuracy. Many users pair it with IWB holsters like Alien Gear Holsters for comfortable all-day carry while maintaining accessibility during emergencies.
Concealed Carry & Practical Use
Comfort for Daily Carry
The Bodyguard 2.0 and Glock 42 are both designed with concealed carry in mind, but their ergonomics cater to different preferences.
The Bodyguard 2.0's slim profile, at just 0.75 inches wide, ensures minimal printing under clothing, making it ideal for deep concealment in IWB (inside-the-waistband) or appendix holsters. Its lightweight frame of 14.4 ounces reduces fatigue during extended wear, especially for users prioritizing discretion over prolonged shooting comfort.
The Glock 42, slightly larger at 0.94 inches wide and weighing 13.76 ounces unloaded, offers a balance between concealability and handling ease. While its dimensions make it suitable for most IWB or OWB (outside-the-waistband) holsters, the added grip surface enhances control during rapid fire compared to the Bodyguard’s compact design.
For those who value all-day comfort without sacrificing shootability, the Glock 42 pairs well with premium options like Alien Gear Holsters.
Draw Speed & Accessibility
Quick access is critical in defensive scenarios, and each model presents unique advantages based on your setup and training routine. The Bodyguard 2.0's smaller size allows faster draws from tighter concealment positions such as ankle rigs or pocket holsters when paired with proper practice drills. Its integrated laser sight can assist in target acquisition under stress but may require additional muscle memory to activate efficiently.
The Glock 42 excels in draw consistency due to its ergonomic grip angle and smoother contours that reduce snag risks during deployment from IWB or appendix carry setups. Competitive shooters often favor this model for its intuitive point-and-shoot capability during high-pressure situations where fractions of a second matter most.
Regardless of choice, regular dry-fire practice combined with live-fire sessions will enhance your proficiency across various carry methods and holster configurations tailored to these firearms' designs.
Holster Recommendations
Selecting the right holster enhances comfort, accessibility, and safety when carrying either the Bodyguard 2.0 or Glock 42. Each firearm's compact size supports various carry methods, but holster type significantly impacts your draw speed and concealment.
OWB, IWB, Appendix, Chest & Other Options
OWB (Outside-the-Waistband): OWB holsters suit open carry or range use due to their ease of access. For the Glock 42, consider a Boltaron-made Alien Gear Cloak Mod OWB Paddle Holster for durability and secure retention. The Bodyguard 2.0 pairs well with slim-profile OWB options that minimize printing during concealed carry under loose clothing.
IWB (Inside-the-Waistband): IWB holsters maximize concealability by tucking inside your waistband. A hybrid IWB holster with adjustable cant accommodates both models effectively. The Glock 42 benefits from designs offering sweat guards for added comfort during extended wear.
Appendix Carry: Appendix rigs provide quick access while maintaining deep concealment. Minimalist Kydex appendix holsters are ideal for the Bodyguard 2.0 due to its lightweight frame. Ensure proper trigger guard coverage to prevent accidental discharge.
Chest Rigs: Chest holsters cater to outdoor enthusiasts or law enforcement requiring hands-free access in active scenarios. Modular chest systems fit both pistols securely without compromising mobility.
Final Thoughts — Which One Should You Choose?
Choosing between the Bodyguard 2.0 and Glock 42 eventually comes down to your personal priorities and lifestyle. If deep concealment, lightweight design, and integrated features like a laser sight are key for you, the Bodyguard 2.0 is an excellent option. On the other hand, if you're looking for superior shootability, smoother performance, and customization potential, the Glock 42 might be better suited to your needs.
Both pistols have their strengths and cater to different preferences. Whichever you choose, ensure it aligns with your comfort level during training and daily carry. Regular practice will not only enhance your proficiency but also build confidence in whichever firearm becomes part of your routine.
Explore our Glock 42 holsters:
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What are the main differences between the Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 and Glock 42?
The Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 is smaller, lighter, and features an integrated laser sight for enhanced low-light performance, making it ideal for deep concealment. The Glock 42, while slightly larger, offers better shootability with a smoother trigger pull, softer recoil, and more customization options.
2. Which pistol is better for beginners: Bodyguard 2.0 or Glock 42?
The Bodyguard 2.0 is often recommended for beginners due to its lightweight design and ease of concealment. However, the Glock 42’s smoother trigger and reduced recoil may appeal to those who prioritize comfort during training sessions.
3. Is the .380 ACP caliber effective for self-defense?
Yes, the .380 ACP caliber is considered effective for self-defense when paired with proper ammunition. It offers manageable recoil in compact pistols like the Bodyguard 2.0 and Glock 42 while maintaining sufficient stopping power.
4. How does magazine capacity compare between these two models?
Both pistols come standard with six-round magazines; however, the Glock 42 allows aftermarket extensions to increase capacity without compromising concealability.
5. Which pistol has better ergonomics: Bodyguard 2.0 or Glock 42?
The Glock 42 generally provides superior ergonomics due to its slightly larger size and comfortable grip design, which improves control during shooting sessions compared to the slimmer profile of the Bodyguard 2.0.
6. Does either model have built-in safety features?
Yes, both models include safety features: The Bodyguard 2.0 uses a heavier double-action-only trigger as a passive safety measure, while the Glock 42 incorporates internal safeties along with a lighter trigger pull.
7. Which handgun is easier to carry daily?
The Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 is easier to carry daily due to its slim profile and lightweight design, making it highly concealable even in tighter clothing or discreet positions like pocket or ankle holsters.
8. Can I customize my concealed carry pistol?
Yes! While both models offer some level of customization (e.g., holsters), the Glock 42 stands out with more aftermarket accessories available for extended magazines, sights upgrades, and grips.
9. What type of holster works best for each model?
For maximum concealability: IWB (Inside-the-Waistband) holsters work well for both pistols; OWB (Outside-the-Waistband) suits users prioritizing accessibility over discretion; pocket or ankle holsters are ideal specifically for the slim-profiled Bodyguard 2.0.
10. How do I decide which pistol fits my needs best?
Consider your priorities: Choose the Bodyguard if you value portability and deep concealment or opt for the Glock if you prefer enhanced handling and performance during practice sessions or longer distances shooting tests!