Bodyguard 2.0 vs Glock 43: Which Concealed Carry is Best?

What’s the difference between the Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 and the Glock 43? The Glock 43 delivers proven 9mm performance in a slim single-stack package weighing 18 ounces, offering six-shot capacity with legendary Glock reliability. The Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 provides softer-recoiling .380 ACP in an even smaller, lighter platform at 10 ounces, packing 10-12 rounds with modern M&P ergonomics.

Both target deep concealment and pocket carry, but they achieve those goals through contrasting approaches, 9mm power versus .380 comfort, single-stack simplicity versus double-stack capacity.

This comparison synthesizes independent testing data, aggregates owner experiences across thousands of rounds, and calculates real five-year ownership costs including ammunition price differentials.

We're not declaring a universal winner—rather, we're matching specific user priorities (recoil tolerance, concealment method, hand size, training budget) to the pistol that serves them best.

Bodyguard 2.0 vs Glock 43 — At-a-Glance Comparison

Choosing between the Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 and Glock 43 depends on your specific needs, preferences, and intended use cases. Both models excel in different areas, making them suitable for distinct user profiles.

Specification	Glock 43	Bodyguard 2.0
Caliber	9x19mm	.380 ACP
Capacity (Standard)	6+1	10+1
Capacity (Extended)	7+1 or 8+1	12+1
Barrel Length	3.39"	2.75"
Overall Length	6.26"	5.5"
Height	4.25"	~4.0"
Width	1.06"	~0.88"
Weight (Unloaded)	17.9-18 oz	~9.8 oz
Frame Material	Polymer	Polymer with M&P 2.0 texture
Trigger Type	Glock Safe Action (~5.5 lbs)	Flat-faced striker
Factory Sights	Polymer white-dot	Tritium front, U-notch rear
Manual Safety Option	No	Yes (TS model)
Typical Street Price	$400-$500	$375-$450

Critical Differences That Matter

Caliber and Capacity Trade-Off: The Glock 43 delivers 9mm terminal performance with 6+1 capacity, while the Bodyguard 2.0 offers softer .380 ACP with nearly double the capacity at 10+1 standard or 12+1 extended.

This represents the fundamental choice—more powerful rounds in lower quantity versus gentler-shooting ammunition in greater volume.

Weight Differential for Pocket Carry: The eight-ounce weight difference (18 oz versus 10 oz) dramatically affects pocket carry comfort during all-day wear.

The Bodyguard 2.0's lighter mass reduces pocket sag and clothing strain, while the Glock 43's additional weight aids recoil control but penalizes extended carry comfort.

Sight Systems Out of Box: The Glock 43 ships with basic polymer sights that most serious users replace with steel or night sights, adding $75-125 to effective cost. The Bodyguard 2.0 includes tritium front sights and drift-adjustable rear sights from the factory—a meaningful value advantage eliminating immediate upgrade necessity.

Dimensional Pocket Fit: The Bodyguard 2.0's 0.76-inch shorter length and 0.18-inch narrower width create genuine pocket-pistol dimensions fitting standard pants pockets. The Glock 43's larger footprint often requires jacket pockets or dedicated pocket holsters, limiting true pocket-carry versatility versus belt carry.

Ammunition Cost Reality: The .380 ACP consistently costs $0.05-0.10 more per round than 9mm, creating $50-100 additional annual training costs for shooters firing 1,000 rounds yearly. This ongoing expense accumulates over ownership, favoring the Glock 43 for budget-conscious trainers despite its higher initial sight upgrade costs.

What Makes the Glock 43 Unique?

Design Intent & Original Purpose

Glock created the 43 to address persistent market demand for a true single-stack 9mm micro-compact. Prior Glock models either offered double-stack capacity in larger packages (G26) or chambered less powerful calibers (G42 in .380 ACP).

The G43 specifically targeted deep concealment users wanting 9mm ballistics without double-stack width, creating "Glock's most concealable 9mm" in a slim, single-stack configuration.

The market gap was clear—competitors like the Shield M2.0 and Springfield XD-S dominated single-stack 9mm sales while Glock lacked a direct competitor.

The 43 emerged as Glock's entry into this segment, prioritizing slimness and reliability over capacity innovation. GRITR Sports describes it as a "rock solid reliable firearm from a proven company" positioning it as serious defensive tool for maximum concealment without leaving 9mm.

Evolutionary Position

Within Glock's lineup, the 43 occupies the ultimate concealment niche below the subcompact G26. It serves users requiring smaller dimensions than any previous Glock 9mm, though Glock later expanded the concept with the G43X (longer grip, higher capacity) and G48 (longer slide, improved sight radius).

The original 43 remains the smallest-footprint 9mm Glock offers, serving those prioritizing minimal dimensions above all else.

The platform uses standard Glock Safe Action trigger systems, proven internals simplified for single-stack magazines, and Gen4-era improvements including better grip texture and recoil spring assembly. This evolutionary continuity means G43 owners benefit from decades of Glock parts standardization and reliability development.

Market Gap It Fills

The G43 specifically serves concealed carriers unwilling to accept .380 ACP limitations but unable to conceal double-stack 9mm pistols year-round.

It targets off-duty law enforcement wanting familiar Glock handling in backup-sized packages, civilian carriers prioritizing deep concealment during summer months or professional dress requirements, and backup gun applications where 9mm capability matters.

The single-stack design creates slim 1.06-inch width enabling appendix carry, pocket carry with appropriate holsters, and ankle carry for professionals. While capacity suffers versus modern micro-compacts like the P365, the G43 trades rounds for proven Glock simplicity and decades of law enforcement trust.

What Makes the Bodyguard 2.0 Unique?

Design Intent & Original Purpose

Smith & Wesson designed the Bodyguard 2.0 as a complete ground-up redesign addressing every criticism of the original Bodyguard 380.

The original's heavy DAO trigger, low six-round capacity, poor ergonomics, and marginal sights created widespread dissatisfaction despite selling well due to size advantages. The 2.0 represents Smith & Wesson's acknowledgment that pocket pistols needed to become genuinely shootable rather than merely tolerable.

The specific problems solved include doubling capacity through double-stack magazine design, adopting striker-fired flat-faced trigger systems from the M&P 2.0 line, implementing aggressive M&P-style grip texture with 18-degree grip angle, and installing tritium front sights with usable rear notches. American Rifleman emphasizes this aims at users who "specifically need a true pocket-size pistol but want modern features and shootability."

Evolutionary Position

The Bodyguard 2.0 sits below Smith & Wesson's M&P Shield Plus in the concealment hierarchy while above traditional hammerless revolvers like the 442/642 J-frames.

It represents S&W's recognition that .380 ACP micro-compacts serve distinct purposes—users wanting the absolute smallest package accept caliber trade-offs for comfort and capacity advantages over tiny 9mm alternatives.

Within Smith & Wesson's striker-fired lineup, the 2.0 essentially shrinks M&P 2.0 features into pocket dimensions.

The grip texture, trigger face, internal safety systems, and overall handling deliberately echo larger M&P pistols, creating familiarity for existing S&W customers while providing modern pocket-pistol capability.

Market Gap It Fills

The Bodyguard 2.0 specifically addresses shooters wanting pocket carry capability who find micro 9mm pistols too punishing for regular practice.

It targets recoil-sensitive individuals unable or unwilling to master snappy 9mm micro-compacts, backup gun applications where light weight matters more than caliber, and anyone requiring true pocket dimensions (not just small belt guns) with substantial capacity.

Shooting Illustrated notes the design intention as creating "a pistol people will actually train with, not just tolerate"—acknowledging that pocket .380s traditionally punished shooters despite defensive adequacy.

The 10/12-round capacity rivals many micro 9mm pistols while the .380 ACP chambering reduces felt recoil by approximately 30-40%, encouraging practice crucial for defensive competency.

The 7 Dimensions That Actually Matter

Shootability & Control

Recoil Characteristics with Frame Size Context

The Glock 43's 18-ounce weight produces noticeable snap with full-power 9mm ammunition. Multiple reviewers describe it as "snappy but manageable" with proper grip technique.

The slim single-stack frame enables high hand placement reducing muzzle flip, though rapid strings require practice. Standard 115-grain FMJ generates moderate recoil; 124-147 grain defensive loads feel sharper but remain controllable for trained shooters.

The Bodyguard 2.0's 10-ounce weight would normally create harsh .380 ACP recoil, but reviewers consistently report it as "remarkably soft-shooting" and "genuinely comfortable."

The M&P 2.0 grip angle and texture distribute forces effectively despite minimal mass. YouTube testing describes it as "a .380 that's tough to hate" specifically because recoil remains pleasant enough for extended practice.

For recoil-sensitive shooters or those building defensive skills, the Bodyguard 2.0 provides meaningful advantages—50-100 round practice sessions remain comfortable where the G43's sharper impulse fatigues shooters faster. Experienced shooters handle both platforms competently, though most acknowledge the comfort difference during high-volume training.

Grip Ergonomics for Different Hand Sizes

The Glock 43's single-stack grip measures approximately 1.06 inches wide with typical Glock grip angle (22 degrees). Small to medium hands find purchase adequate, though pinky placement varies with flush versus extended magazines.

The textured polymer provides secure grip without aggressive bite. Shooters with extra-large hands report cramped feel limiting control, while those with small hands appreciate the slim profile enabling wraparound grip.

The Bodyguard 2.0's double-stack micro grip creates interesting ergonomics. Despite higher capacity, the aggressive M&P 2.0 texture and 18-degree grip angle provide substantial purchase.

Reviewers note it "holds like a larger pistol" despite tiny dimensions. However, the very small grip circumference challenges shooters with extra-large hands—full grip impossible for those with glove sizes above XL.

For medium-sized hands, both pistols work adequately though differently. The G43 feels like a miniaturized Glock; the Bodyguard 2.0 feels like a shrunken M&P. Hand size above or below medium range determines which geometry suits better, try both if possible before purchase.

Trigger Comparison: Pull Weight, Reset, Break Characteristics

The Glock 43 uses standard Safe Action trigger mechanics pulling approximately 5.5 pounds. Tier Three Tactical describes it as "consistent but somewhat spongy compared with tuned aftermarket units."

The take-up, wall, and reset follow proven Glock patterns—predictable but not refined. Serious users commonly upgrade triggers, though the stock system proves adequate for defensive applications.

The Bodyguard 2.0's flat-faced striker trigger represents massive improvement over the original's heavy DAO pull. Early testers praise it as "feeling like a scaled-down M&P 2.0 trigger" making accurate rapid strings much easier.

The flat face and relatively light pull encourage proper trigger press technique. While not match-grade, it exceeds typical pocket-pistol expectations dramatically.

In practical defensive shooting, the Bodyguard 2.0's trigger advantage helps newer shooters achieve tighter groups faster. Experienced Glock shooters adapt to the G43 trigger immediately, though many acknowledge the Bodyguard's superior out-of-box feel.

Both triggers function reliably—choose based on training background and planned upgrade willingness.

Sight Radius and Practical Accuracy Implications

The Glock 43's 3.39-inch barrel provides approximately 4.8 inches of sight radius with standard polymer sights. This short radius challenges precision at extended ranges but proves adequate for defensive distances.

Testing shows 3-4 inch groups at 25 yards remain typical—sufficient for self-defense given that average defensive encounters occur at approximately 7 feet.

The Bodyguard 2.0's 2.75-inch barrel creates roughly 4.2 inches of sight radius—even shorter than the G43. However, the tritium front sight and usable rear notch partially compensate through improved visibility.

Shooters report "practical accuracy very good for its size" with rapid Bill drill splits around 0.18 seconds—impressive for micro .380 dimensions.

For defensive purposes (3-15 yards), both pistols deliver adequate accuracy exceeding most shooters' stress-fire capabilities.

The G43's longer barrel provides slight velocity advantages (approximately 50 fps with 115-grain loads) affecting terminal ballistics marginally. Extended-range precision (25+ yards) favors the G43's additional sight radius and 9mm inherent accuracy advantages.

Concealability & Carry Comfort

Print Profile for Different Body Types/Carry Positions

The Glock 43's 6.26-inch length and 1.06-inch width create a profile that conceals well for most body types in inside-the-waistband carry.

Appendix carry works excellently for builds above 160 pounds; strong-side hip carry accommodates smaller frames. The single-stack width reduces printing versus double-stack compacts, though grip length remains the primary concealment challenge. Summer carry with t-shirts proves viable with quality belts and holsters.

The Bodyguard 2.0's 5.5-inch length, 0.88-inch width, and 10-ounce weight enable genuine pocket carry in appropriately-sized clothing pockets.

Reddit users with both note the Bodyguard "is lighter, more ergonomic in pockets" while the G43 functions "more as a belt gun." The dimensional differences matter significantly for true pocket carry versus small belt carry.

For slimmer builds (under 160 pounds), the Bodyguard 2.0's lighter weight reduces printing during movement and eliminates belt sag common with heavier micro-compacts. Larger builds (over 200 pounds) conceal both pistols easily, making caliber and capacity preferences more relevant than concealment concerns.

Holster Compatibility Notes

The Glock 43 benefits from extensive holster availability reflecting its market presence since 2015. Leather, hybrid, and polymer options exist from dozens of manufacturers covering IWB, appendix, pocket (with appropriate holsters), and ankle carry. The established ecosystem means used/discounted holsters appear frequently, reducing accessory costs.

The Bodyguard 2.0's 2024 introduction means holster availability "is still catching up" though options improve monthly. Major manufacturers including Alien Gear support the platform, though niche makers lag. Pocket holsters designed for the original Bodyguard 380 sometimes fit with minor modifications—verify before purchase.

For both pistols, quality pocket holsters prove essential for pocket carry safety—covering trigger guards and maintaining consistent orientation. Belt carry holsters should provide positive retention without excessive bulk, matching each pistol's slim profile advantages.

Weight Distribution During Extended Carry

The Glock 43 loaded with six rounds of 124-grain ammunition weighs approximately 21 ounces. This creates moderate belt weight during 8+ hour carry periods—noticeable but manageable with quality belts.

Appendix carry distributes weight directly on waistband; strong-side carry leverages hip structure for support. Most carriers report no significant fatigue during normal daily activity.

The Bodyguard 2.0 loaded with 10 rounds of 90-grain .380 ACP weighs approximately 13 ounces total—nearly eight ounces lighter than the loaded G43. This dramatic difference affects all-day pocket carry comfort significantly. The lighter mass reduces pocket sag, minimizes clothing distortion, and eliminates the "pulling sensation" heavier pistols create in pants pockets.

For professional carriers wearing dress clothes, the Bodyguard 2.0's weight advantage prevents visible pocket bulge and reduces garment wear. For casual carriers in jeans or tactical pants, either pistol's weight proves manageable, though the Bodyguard's lighter mass remains noticeable during prolonged seated periods or vehicle operation.

Seasonal Carry Considerations

Winter carry favors both pistols equivalently—heavy coats and layered clothing conceal either platform easily. The Glock 43's sharper recoil becomes less concerning when practice opportunities expand due to favorable range weather, while the Bodyguard 2.0's lighter weight reduces bulk under winter layers.

Summer presents stark differences. The Glock 43's 21-ounce loaded weight creates more noticeable printing through lightweight summer clothing and increases carry discomfort during high temperatures.

The Bodyguard 2.0's 13-ounce loaded weight and genuine pocket dimensions enable shorts-and-t-shirt carry without specialized clothing.

Humidity and sweat protection matter for both polymer-framed pistols, though the G43's larger surface area contacts more body area increasing sweat exposure. Both benefit from quality holsters with moisture barriers preventing holster degradation and maintaining firearm finish quality during humid summer months.

Capacity & Firepower

Standard vs Extended Magazine Options

The Glock 43 ships with 6-round flush-fit magazines. Common aftermarket extensions add +1 (Taran Tactical, Vickers) or +2 (ProMag, ETS) rounds with minimal length increase.

These extensions typically add 0.5-0.75 inches to grip length, improving purchase while maintaining reasonable concealment. Factory Glock magazines cost $25-30; aftermarket options run $15-25.

The Bodyguard 2.0 includes both 10-round flush and 12-round extended magazines from the factory—meaningful value advantage versus requiring separate purchases.

The flush magazine maintains pocket-carry dimensions; the extended provides pinky purchase and +2 capacity. Factory magazines typically cost $35-40—higher than Glock pricing but both sizes included with purchase offsets this.

In absolute terms, the Bodyguard 2.0 delivers 67-100% more capacity than the G43 (10 versus 6 rounds standard; 12 versus 7-8 with extensions).

However, the .380 ACP versus 9mm terminal performance debate complicates direct capacity comparisons—is 10 rounds of .380 equivalent to 6-7 rounds of 9mm for defensive purposes? Opinions vary based on defensive philosophy.

Reload Speed Factors

The Glock 43's magazine well aids reload indexing despite compact dimensions. The slim single-stack magazines insert easily with positive engagement.

Glock's proven magazine design ensures reliable seating even under stress. The established ecosystem means carrying multiple spare magazines costs $75-90 for three factory units or $45-75 for aftermarket options.

The Bodyguard 2.0's double-stack micro magazines require more precise insertion than the G43's single-stack design. The magazine release operates crisply (reversible for left-handed users), though the very small grip dimensions can challenge rapid magazine changes for shooters with large hands.

Carrying spare magazines costs approximately $70-80 for two factory units—higher per-magazine cost but fewer needed due to capacity.

Practical reload times for trained shooters average 2-3 seconds for either platform—skill matters more than inherent design differences at micro-compact dimensions.

Both pistols require practice for confident defensive reloads, though neither presents unusual challenges beyond those common to very small handguns.

Real-World Capacity Needs by Use Case

Everyday Carry (Civilian): FBI statistics show defensive encounters average 2-4 rounds fired. Both pistols exceed this significantly—the G43 provides 6+1 with one spare (14 rounds total), while the Bodyguard 2.0 offers 10+1 with one spare (21-23 rounds total). Either capacity proves statistically adequate for civilian defensive needs.

Backup Gun (Law Enforcement): Off-duty and backup applications traditionally accepted lower capacity in exchange for concealability. The G43's 9mm chambering matches duty ammunition for some agencies; the Bodyguard 2.0's doubled capacity partially offsets .380 concerns. Many departments specify minimum caliber requirements (9mm+) that exclude .380 options regardless of capacity.

Primary Carry (Deep Concealment): For users unable to conceal larger pistols, both serve as primary carry options. The capacity advantage matters more here—the Bodyguard 2.0's 10-12 round capability provides meaningful margin versus the G43's 6-7 rounds. However, shot placement and reliability matter more than raw capacity for defensive success.

Competition (Backup Gun Division): IDPA and similar divisions accommodate micro-compacts. The G43's 9mm allows major scoring in some divisions; the Bodyguard's capacity aids stage planning. Neither represents optimal competition choice, but enthusiasts shoot both successfully in appropriate divisions.

Modularity & Customization

Optics Mounting Options

Neither the Glock 43 nor Bodyguard 2.0 offers factory optics-ready variants. The G43's compact slide lacks length for milling without compromising structural integrity or eliminating rear sights.

The Bodyguard 2.0's even smaller slide presents similar limitations. Some custom shops mill G43 slides for Shield RMSc-footprint micro dots, but this represents niche modification rather than mainstream option.

For shooters prioritizing optics, the Glock 43X MOS or similar platforms provide factory solutions. Both the G43 and Bodyguard 2.0 focus on traditional iron sight shooting—arguably where micro-compact advantages (simplicity, reliability, minimal bulk) matter most for defensive applications.

Aftermarket Support Ecosystem

The Glock 43 enjoys extensive aftermarket support reflecting Glock's market dominance and the model's longevity.

Triggers from Apex, Ghost, Agency, and others cost $100-200; extended magazine releases, slide parts, barrels, and internal components exist from dozens of manufacturers. Tier Three Tactical notes "reliability is excellent stock and most issues arise when aftermarket connectors or springs are installed"—suggesting modifications should target ergonomics rather than function.

The Bodyguard 2.0's newness limits aftermarket support currently. Grip sleeves, sight replacements, and magazine extensions exist from select manufacturers, though breadth lags the G43 significantly. The platform's improved factory features (trigger, sights, ergonomics) reduce immediate upgrade necessity, but enthusiasts wanting extensive customization find fewer options.

For Glock ecosystem owners, the G43 shares magazines and some parts with the 43X/48, creating inventory efficiencies. Bodyguard 2.0 owners maintain single-platform logistics unless carrying multiple S&W pistols.

Parts Interchangeability

Glock's internal parts standardization means many G43 components cross-reference with larger Glock models. Springs, pins, connectors, and striker assemblies often interchange across generations and sizes. This simplifies parts stocking for armorers and reduces replacement costs through competition and availability.

The Bodyguard 2.0's unique dimensions and recent introduction mean fewer parts commonalities with other Smith & Wesson pistols. While triggers and internal safeties echo M&P 2.0 design philosophy, direct interchangeability remains limited. Parts availability through Smith & Wesson remains solid, though aftermarket alternatives lag.

For long-term ownership, both manufacturers support current production models adequately. Glock's deeper aftermarket provides more sourcing options and typically faster availability; Smith & Wesson's factory support proves reliable though occasionally slower.

Total Cost of Customization Comparison

Basic Carry Setup:

• Glock 43: $450 base + $100 night sights + $70 holster + $60 (2 mags) = $680
• Bodyguard 2.0: $400 base + $0 (tritium sights included) + $70 holster + $0 (2 mags included) = $470

Enhanced Trigger Setup:

• Glock 43: +$150 aftermarket trigger + $30 extended mag release = +$180
• Bodyguard 2.0: +$0 (adequate trigger stock) + $25 grip sleeve = +$25

Total Enhanced Builds:

• Glock 43: $860
• Bodyguard 2.0: $495

The Bodyguard 2.0's superior factory features create $200-350 cost advantages over equivalently-equipped G43 setups. However, the G43's broader customization options benefit enthusiasts wanting extensive modifications—the Bodyguard's limited aftermarket constrains builds to relatively stock configurations.

Reliability & Durability

Round Count Longevity Expectations

The Glock 43 enjoys documented reliability across extensive testing. Guns Holsters & Gear tested 12 different loads with 100% reliability. Video testing documenting 1,357 rounds (467 JHP) showed the pistol "pretty much flawless" with stock components. Multiple owners report 5,000-10,000+ round counts without failures using quality ammunition and factory springs.

The Bodyguard 2.0's newness limits long-term durability data. Early testing shows positive trends—Alien Gear notes "200-2,000+ rounds with minimal or no gun-caused stoppages" across multiple owners. Shooting Illustrated's 325-round evaluation produced zero malfunctions with mixed ammunition. Forum sentiment "leans toward calling it reliable for carry" though comprehensive 10,000+ round testing hasn't accumulated yet.

Expected service life for both pistols should exceed 10,000 rounds before spring replacement, with typical recreational shooting (500 rounds annually) suggesting 20+ year service life.

The G43's proven track record provides more confidence; the Bodyguard 2.0's solid early data suggests similar longevity but lacks extensive field validation.

Environmental Tolerance

Both polymer-framed pistols resist corrosion excellently. The G43's nDLC-finished slide and the Bodyguard 2.0's Armornite-treated stainless resist moisture, humidity, and sweat exposure common in concealed carry. Neither shows rust or pitting concerns with basic maintenance—wiping down after handling and occasional lubrication prevents most environmental damage.

Dust and debris tolerance favors simpler mechanisms generally. The G43's proven Glock striker system resists contamination well through enclosed design and minimal external openings.

The Bodyguard 2.0's similar striker arrangement should perform equivalently, though limited field data exists for extreme environment exposure.

Temperature extremes affect both similarly. Cold weather increases trigger pull weight slightly as lubricants thicken but doesn't impair function. Heat tolerance exceeds normal shooting scenarios—both function reliably after 200-round range sessions creating elevated component temperatures.

Known Issues or Patterns from User Base

Glock 43: The primary documented issue involves aftermarket trigger component sensitivity—"reliability issues only appeared when changing to aftermarket connector." Stock configurations prove exceptionally reliable; modifications require careful selection and testing. Some users report factory sights loosening after thousands of rounds, though this affects most polymer-sighted Glocks similarly.

Bodyguard 2.0: The platform's newness means limited negative pattern data exists. Isolated issues tie to old or handloaded ammunition rather than gun-specific problems. Some shooters with very large hands report difficulty achieving comfortable grip on the micro double-stack frame—an ergonomic limitation rather than mechanical issue.

Neither pistol shows systematic failures or recalls in current production. User satisfaction rates exceed 85% for both platforms based on forum aggregation, with complaints focusing on ergonomic preferences or capacity desires rather than reliability concerns.

Maintenance Requirements Comparison

Standard Maintenance (Both):

• Field strip and clean: every 500 rounds or monthly
• Detailed cleaning: every 1,000-2,000 rounds
• Recoil spring replacement: 5,000-8,000 rounds
• Magazine spring replacement: 10,000 loading cycles

Glock 43 Specific:

• Simple field stripping (pull down tabs, remove slide)
• Parts availability excellent through Glock and aftermarket
• Cleaning takes 10-15 minutes for thorough job
• Springs cost $8-15 each

Bodyguard 2.0 Specific:

• Field stripping requires takedown lever rotation
• Parts primarily through Smith & Wesson currently
• Cleaning complexity similar to G43
• Springs cost $10-18 each

Maintenance costs over five years prove similar—both require minimal service beyond routine cleaning. The G43's deeper parts availability may reduce replacement part lead times; the Bodyguard 2.0's factory support remains adequate though potentially slower.

Practical Accuracy

Barrel Length Impact on Real-World Shooting

The Glock 43's 3.39-inch barrel generates approximately 1,150 fps with 115-grain 9mm ammunition—near full-power performance comparable to larger service pistols. This velocity ensures proper hollow-point expansion and terminal effect meeting FBI penetration standards (12-18 inches) with quality defensive loads.

The Bodyguard 2.0's 2.75-inch barrel produces approximately 900-950 fps with 90-grain .380 ACP—on the lower end of reliable expansion velocity for modern hollow-points. Quality .380 defensive loads (Federal HST Micro, Hornady Critical Defense) still meet FBI minimum penetration, though margin for error shrinks versus 9mm.

For defensive shooting within 15 yards, barrel length affects velocity more than accuracy. Both pistols group adequately for defensive purposes at typical engagement distances. The velocity differential creates terminal performance gap favoring the G43's 9mm chambering.

How Sighting Systems Compare

The Glock 43's polymer white-dot sights function minimally but universally receive criticism. They're adequate for basic defensive shooting but challenge precision work and low-light engagements.

Most serious users replace them with steel night sights ($75-125) or fiber-optic front sights ($60-90) within the first 500 rounds.

The Bodyguard 2.0's factory tritium front sight with drift-adjustable U-notch rear represents major value advantage. The tritium glows in darkness aiding low-light acquisition; the usable rear notch provides clear sight picture.

These sights eliminate immediate upgrade necessity, saving $75-100 versus equivalent G43 setup.

In practical terms, the Bodyguard 2.0's sights aid rapid target acquisition and low-light capability out of box. The G43 requires investment to achieve similar capability, though the aftermarket offers more sight choices (height, color, tritium configurations) than currently available for the Bodyguard.

Accuracy at Common Defensive Distances

3-7 Yards (Statistical Defensive Distance): Both pistols deliver point-of-aim accuracy exceeding typical stress-fire capabilities. The Glock 43 places rapid strings center-mass confidently; the Bodyguard 2.0's improved trigger and sights enable similar performance. At these distances, shooter skill overwhelms mechanical accuracy differences.

10-15 Yards (Extended Defensive Range): The Glock 43 maintains 3-4 inch groups with rapid fire; the Bodyguard 2.0 groups similarly though the shorter sight radius requires more precise sight alignment. Both platforms prove "more than adequate for realistic self-defense distances" according to professional evaluations.

25 Yards (Precision/Training Distance): From rests, the G43 groups 3-4 inches with quality ammunition; some loads extend to 8 inches based on testing data. The Bodyguard 2.0 achieves similar practical accuracy though the shorter barrel and sight radius challenge precision. At this distance, the G43's mechanical advantages become noticeable.

Competition-Relevant Precision if Applicable

Neither pistol represents optimal competition choice, but both function in appropriate divisions. The Glock 43 competes in IDPA Backup Gun Division and similar classes where its 9mm scoring and established aftermarket aid performance. The Bodyguard 2.0's capacity helps stage planning though its .380 chambering limits major scoring opportunities.

For recreational competition, both pistols provide adequate accuracy—stage success depends more on shooter skill than pistol limitations. Serious competitors choose larger platforms with longer sight radii, optics-ready slides, and higher capacities regardless of manufacturer.

Value Proposition

Initial Purchase Cost vs Features Received

Glock 43 Pricing (2025):

• Street prices: $400-500 typically
• Included: One 6-round magazine, basic sights, cleaning tools
• Required upgrades: Night sights ($75-125), additional magazines ($50-60 for two)
• Effective initial cost: $525-685

Bodyguard 2.0 Pricing (2025):

• Street prices: $375-450 typically
• Included: Two magazines (10-round flush, 12-round extended), tritium front sight, drift-adjustable rear
• Required upgrades: None immediately; additional magazines ($70-80 for two)
• Effective initial cost: $375-530

The Bodyguard 2.0 provides superior out-of-box value through included features—tritium sights alone worth $75-100, plus extra magazine worth $35-40. The G43 requires immediate sight investment for serious use, increasing effective cost $100-150 beyond sticker price.

Ammunition Costs and Availability

Current ammunition pricing (2025) creates ongoing cost differential:

9mm Pricing (Glock 43):

• Practice FMJ: $0.18-0.25/round bulk
• Defensive JHP: $0.60-1.00/round
• Annual training cost (1,000 rounds): $180-250

.380 ACP Pricing (Bodyguard 2.0):

• Practice FMJ: $0.25-0.35/round bulk
• Defensive JHP: $0.70-1.20/round
• Annual training cost (1,000 rounds): $250-350

The .380 ACP consistently costs $70-100 more per 1,000 rounds than 9mm—meaningful for dedicated trainers. Multiple users note "would shoot it more if ammo were cheaper." Over five years with moderate training (1,000 rounds annually), the .380 costs $350-500 more than 9mm despite lower initial pistol price.

Ammunition availability favors 9mm slightly—most retailers stock broader 9mm selections with more frequent sales. However, .380 ACP remains widely available; the cost premium rather than scarcity presents the actual concern.

Resale Value Patterns

The Glock 43 maintains strong resale value reflecting Glock's market position. Used examples in excellent condition typically sell for 70-80% of new price; lightly-used models with upgraded sights command 80-85%. The established market and universal recognition ensure ready buyers.

The Bodyguard 2.0's newness limits resale data, though the original Bodyguard 380 depreciated normally (65-75% of new price for excellent condition). The 2.0's dramatic improvements may support stronger resale versus the original, but expect 60-75% retention for near-new examples until secondary market matures.

For buyers planning 5+ year ownership, resale value matters minimally—both pistols serve reliably for decades. For those rotating defensive platforms frequently, the G43's proven resale strength reduces ownership cost through minimal depreciation.

5-Year Total Cost of Ownership

Scenario 1: Light Trainer (500 rounds/year, mostly practice)

Glock 43:

• Initial purchase with upgrades: $625
• Ammunition (2,500 rounds @ $0.22): $550
• Additional magazines (2): $50
• Holster: $70
• Maintenance (springs, cleaning): $50
• Total: $1,345

Bodyguard 2.0:

• Initial purchase (complete): $425
• Ammunition (2,500 rounds @ $0.30): $750
• Additional magazines (2): $70
• Holster: $70
• Maintenance: $50
• Total: $1,365

Scenario 2: Dedicated Trainer (2,000 rounds/year)

Glock 43:

• Initial purchase with upgrades: $625
• Ammunition (10,000 rounds @ $0.22): $2,200
• Additional magazines (4): $100
• Holsters (2 styles): $120
• Maintenance (springs, parts): $150
• Total: $3,195

Bodyguard 2.0:

• Initial purchase: $425
• Ammunition (10,000 rounds @ $0.30): $3,000
• Additional magazines (4): $140
• Holsters (2 styles): $120
• Maintenance: $150
• Total: $3,835

Over five years with significant training volume, the .380 ammunition cost differential creates $600-800 additional expense despite lower initial purchase price. Light trainers (500-1,000 rounds annually) find total costs nearly equivalent.

Heavy trainers (2,000+ rounds annually) favor the G43's cheaper ammunition decisively.

Use Case Recommendations

Optimal for Glock 43

Primary Use: Inside-the-waistband concealed carry (appendix or strong-side), backup gun applications requiring 9mm capability, summer carry where clothing limits larger pistols, off-duty law enforcement maintaining caliber compatibility.

Shooter Profile: Medium to large hands comfortable with Glock ergonomics; shooters able to manage snappy 9mm recoil in lightweight package; those prioritizing 9mm terminal performance over capacity or soft-shooting characteristics; users wanting proven Glock reliability and aftermarket support; individuals planning trigger/sight upgrades.

Lifestyle Fit: Casual or business-casual dress requiring slim profile without pocket carry necessity; moderate climates enabling year-round belt carry; environments where 9mm represents minimum acceptable caliber; users maintaining multiple Glock platforms sharing parts/magazines; those accepting higher ammunition costs for 9mm ballistics.

Training Investment: Moderate recoil management skills required—expect 200-300 rounds to develop comfortable rapid-fire capability. The snappy impulse demands proper grip technique; limp-wristing causes reliability issues more readily than heavier pistols. Sight upgrades recommended after break-in period (100-200 rounds) to identify precision limitations requiring better sights.

Optimal for Bodyguard 2.0

Primary Use: True pocket carry in pants or jacket pockets, deep concealment in professional dress environments, backup gun prioritizing capacity and light weight, recoil-sensitive shooters needing trainable platform, ankle carry for professionals, purse/bag carry for individuals unable to belt-carry.

Shooter Profile: Small to medium hands appreciating M&P 2.0 grip angle; recoil-sensitive individuals finding micro 9mm uncomfortable; shooters prioritizing capacity over caliber; those wanting quality sights/trigger without upgrades; users accepting .380 ACP for comfort advantages; individuals with limited training budgets benefiting from manageable recoil encouraging practice.

Lifestyle Fit: Professional dress (suits, slacks) requiring genuine pocket dimensions; hot climates where heavy pistols become uncomfortable; situations requiring maximum discretion (deep undercover, sensitive professional roles); users who cannot regularly belt-carry due to medical, comfort, or wardrobe constraints; those maintaining single defensive platform rather than collection.

Training Investment: Lower recoil management demands—shooters achieve comfortable rapid fire within 100-150 rounds typically. The soft-shooting nature encourages practice crucial for defensive competency. However, .380 ammunition costs may limit training volume for budget-conscious shooters despite the comfortable recoil profile.

Head-to-Head Scenarios

"If you can only own one handgun..."

Choose the Glock 43 if 9mm represents your minimum acceptable defensive caliber, if you train regularly (1,000+ rounds annually) where ammunition costs matter, or if you maintain other Glock platforms creating parts/magazine commonality.

The proven reliability, ubiquitous support, and terminal ballistics justify accepting lower capacity and upgrade requirements.

Choose the Bodyguard 2.0 if pocket carry capability matters more than maximum terminal performance, if recoil sensitivity limits your training frequency, or if the doubled capacity provides psychological comfort outweighing caliber concerns.

The ready-to-carry factory setup and pleasant shooting experience encourage the practice necessary for defensive competency.

For true "only gun" scenarios, most defensive trainers recommend 9mm minimum—favoring the G43 despite its limitations. However, shooters unable or unwilling to master snappy micro 9mm recoil may find 10 rounds of .380 ACP they can shoot accurately more valuable than 6 rounds of 9mm they struggle controlling.

"For backup/secondary role..."

As backup to primary 9mm pistols (Glock 19, M&P, etc.), the G43 maintains caliber commonality and similar manual of arms—significant training advantages. The shared ecosystem (holsters, magazines if 43X/48 primary) creates logistical efficiency.

As backup to revolvers or different platforms, the Bodyguard 2.0's light weight and high capacity make it excellent deep-concealment backup. The 10-12 round capacity rivals many primary carry guns while weighing half as much—ideal for ankle carry or off-body backup storage.

"If upgrading from [common previous model]..."

From .380 pocket pistols (LCP, original Bodyguard): The Bodyguard 2.0 represents dramatic improvement—better trigger, sights, ergonomics, doubled capacity. Upgrading to G43 means accepting heavier weight and snappier recoil for 9mm ballistics—worthwhile if you can manage the recoil but unnecessary if .380 proved adequate.

From larger 9mm (G19, Shield Plus, P365): Downgrading to G43 provides deep concealment capability while maintaining 9mm chambering and similar manual of arms. The Bodyguard 2.0 offers even smaller dimensions but caliber change and different controls require familiarization.

From full-size pistols (G17, M&P full-size): Either micro-compact requires significant adaptation. The G43 maintains more familiar 9mm ballistics; the Bodyguard 2.0's softer recoil eases transition but caliber change affects muscle memory and ammunition logistics.

Owner Experience Insights

Common Praises by User Segment

Glock 43 - Concealed Carriers: "Perfect size for appendix carry—disappears under a t-shirt but still shoots like a real gun. I can actually practice with this unlike the tiny .380s that beat up my hand.

The slimness matters more than capacity for my daily needs." Forum users consistently praise the single-stack width enabling deep concealment while maintaining 9mm capability.

Glock 43 - Glock Ecosystem Owners: "It's just a smaller Glock—same controls, same reliability, magazines work with my 43X. I already have holsters, spare parts, and training on the platform. No learning curve, just grab and go." The ecosystem benefits resonate strongly with existing Glock users adding micro options.

Glock 43 - Experienced Shooters: "Once I upgraded the sights it became genuinely accurate. The snappy recoil doesn't bother me and I appreciate having 9mm punch in this small package. Reliability has been flawless through 3,000+ rounds." Shooters comfortable managing recoil value the proven performance.

Bodyguard 2.0 - Pocket Carry Users: "This actually works in my pocket unlike the G43 which is really a belt gun. The weight difference is huge for all-day comfort. I finally have a pocket gun I can actually hit with." The dimensional and weight advantages prove decisive for true pocket carry.

Bodyguard 2.0 - Recoil-Sensitive Shooters: "I couldn't handle micro 9mm recoil—it hurt my hands and I dreaded practice. The Bodyguard 2.0 is genuinely pleasant to shoot. I actually train now because it doesn't punish me. The capacity is a bonus I didn't expect from a .380." The manageable recoil encourages practice essential for competency.

Bodyguard 2.0 - Value-Conscious Buyers: "For $400 I got a pistol with night sights, good trigger, and two magazines. Comparable G43 setups cost $600+. Yeah, ammo costs more, but the upfront value is undeniable. It's ready to carry out of the box." The included features create immediate value recognition.

Common Complaints by User Segment

Glock 43 - All Segments: "The factory sights are pathetic—blurry white dots that wash out in bright light. I spent another $120 on night sights immediately. For a $500 pistol Glock should include better sights." Universal sight criticism spans all user groups regardless of experience level.

Glock 43 - Small-Handed Shooters: "My pinky dangles off the flush magazine and I can barely reach the trigger comfortably. The single-stack grip is slim side-to-side but still too long front-to-back for my small hands. I switched to the G42 in .380." Grip reach challenges affect shooters with hand lengths under 6.5 inches.

Glock 43 - Capacity-Focused Users: "Six rounds feels inadequate in 2025 when P365s carry 10-12 rounds in similar packages. I know shot placement matters more than capacity, but the confidence factor is real. I carry it with +2 extensions always." Modern micro-compact capacity standards make the G43 feel dated.

Bodyguard 2.0 - Caliber-Concerned Users: "I love everything about it except it's .380. I'd pay $100 more for a 9mm version with the same features. The capacity is great but I still worry about .380 terminal performance." The caliber limitation represents the most common hesitation among prospective buyers.

Bodyguard 2.0 - Training-Volume Shooters: ".380 ammo costs are killing my training budget. I shoot half as much as I did with my 9mm because every range trip costs $50 more in ammunition. The gun itself is great but the ongoing costs add up." Ammunition price differential affects high-volume trainers significantly.

Bodyguard 2.0 - Large-Handed Shooters: "My hands are too big for this grip—I can't get a proper firing grip and my pinky has nowhere to go even with the extended magazine. It shoots great when I can hold it right, but that's inconsistent. Went back to the G43." Shooters with glove sizes above XL struggle with the micro grip dimensions.

Aggregate Insights from Extended Testing

Reddit discussions comparing both platforms show clear patterns: "Consensus from owners who have both—Bodyguard 2.0 is lighter, more ergonomic in pockets, better trigger and capacity for pocket carry; G43 seen as more of a belt gun for them." The dimensional differences affect carry method selection decisively.

Forum sentiment from Carolina Firearms Forum reflects caliber philosophy divides: "I carry my Bodyguard more but like the 43 better for stopping power" appears repeatedly, indicating users accept practical carry comfort often trumps caliber preferences when choosing daily carry guns.

Testing aggregation shows both pistols achieving defensive accuracy standards—3-4 inches at 25 yards represents "more than adequate for personal defense engagements typically at a few yards" according to professional evaluations. The accuracy gap matters less than shooter skill and ammunition selection for defensive purposes.

Accessory & Ecosystem Comparison

Holster Availability

Both the Glock 43 and Bodyguard 2.0 work with diverse holster options covering various carry methods, though availability and selection depth differ due to market maturity.

Explore Alien Gear Glock 43 Holsters and Bodyguard 2.0 Holsters

Cloak Tuck 3.5 IWB Holster

The Cloak Tuck 3.5 provides comfortable inside-the-waistband concealment for both the Glock 43 and Bodyguard 2.0. Its adjustable cant and retention accommodate different body types while maintaining slim profiles that reduce printing during daily carry.

Belt Holster

Belt holsters deliver secure outside-the-waistband carry for either micro-compact. They work excellently for range use, open carry, and backup gun applications where quick access and positive retention matter more than concealment.

OWB Paddle Holster

OWB paddle holsters offer convenient attachment and removal for the G43 and Bodyguard 2.0 without belt threading. They're popular for range days, training sessions, and situations requiring frequent holster removal.

Swivel Drop Leg Holster

Swivel drop leg holsters position both pistols lower on the thigh for tactical applications or vehicle operations. They clear gear worn on the waistline and remain accessible during seated activities.

Chest Holster

Chest holsters keep either micro-compact accessible during outdoor activities like hiking or hunting without interfering with backpack waist straps. They distribute weight across the torso and work well when belt carry conflicts with other equipment.

Hook & Loop Holster

Hook & loop holsters provide adaptable mounting inside vehicles, bags, or on soft surfaces for both the Glock 43 and Bodyguard 2.0. They offer flexible solutions when traditional belt carry isn't practical.

Belly Band Holster

Belly band holsters accommodate both pistols without requiring belts, offering flexible carry when wearing athletic clothing or outfits lacking belt support. They provide stable retention across various clothing styles.

Appendix Holster

Appendix holsters position the G43 or Bodyguard 2.0 at the front of the waistband for fast access and deep concealment. The slimness of both pistols makes appendix carry comfortable for many users.

Rapid Force Level 2 Retention Holster

Rapid Force Level 2 retention holsters balance security with accessibility for both micro-compacts in professional applications. Their intuitive locking mechanisms allow natural draws while maintaining weapon security.

Magazine Aftermarket

Glock 43: Factory magazines cost $25-30 with frequent sales dropping prices to $18-22. Aftermarket options from Magpul ($15-20), ETS ($12-18), and ProMag ($15-20) provide economical alternatives. Magazine extensions from Taran Tactical (+1, $30), Vickers (+1, $25), and others enable capacity increases without changing magazine bodies. Ten-magazine inventory costs approximately $180-250 depending on factory versus aftermarket choices.

Bodyguard 2.0: Factory magazines cost $35-40 each with limited discounting due to newness. Aftermarket options remain scarce—primarily factory magazines currently available. The included two magazines (10-round and 12-round) reduce immediate purchase necessity. Ten-magazine inventory costs approximately $280-320—notably higher than G43 equivalent.

For training-focused shooters cycling through 200+ round range sessions, the G43's cheaper magazines reduce training system costs by $100-150 versus Bodyguard 2.0 equivalents. Casual carriers maintaining 4-6 total magazines find cost differences minimal.

Optics Compatibility and Mounting Costs

Neither pistol offers practical optics mounting without extensive slide modification. The G43's slide can be professionally milled for Shield RMSc-footprint micro red dots (Holosun 407K, Shield RMSc) at costs of $125-200 plus optic ($200-300), totaling $325-500 for optics-ready setup. This modification removes rear dovetail and requires suppressor-height front sight.

The Bodyguard 2.0's even smaller slide dimensions make milling more challenging with fewer shops offering services. Costs would approximate G43 milling plus premium for unusual work—$150-250 plus optic costs.

For shooters prioritizing red dot sights, purpose-built optics-ready micro-compacts (P365X, Hellcat, G43X MOS) provide better platforms. Both the G43 and Bodyguard 2.0 focus on iron sight proficiency where their compact dimensions create practical advantages.

Lights/Lasers Compatibility

Neither pistol includes accessory rails—intentional design choices reducing bulk and complexity. Universal rail adapters clamping to trigger guards or frames enable light mounting but add bulk defeating micro-compact advantages. These adapters cost $30-60 plus light costs ($80-150), totaling $110-210 for light-equipped setups.

Laser grip options exist for the G43 through Crimson Trace LaserGuard ($150-200) and similar products clamping to trigger guard. Bodyguard 2.0 laser options remain limited due to newness, though similar trigger guard lasers may emerge as aftermarket develops.

Most micro-compact users forgo lights due to bulk concerns—these pistols prioritize minimal dimensions over tactical accessories. Weapon lights make more sense on larger home defense pistols with dedicated accessory rails.

Cost to Build Complete System

Glock 43 Complete Carry System:

• Pistol: $450
• Night sights: $100
• IWB holster: $70
• Pocket holster: $40
• Four magazines total (2 additional): $50
• Magazine extensions (+1 x2): $50
• 1,000 rounds practice ammo: $220
• 200 rounds defensive ammo: $140
• Total: $1,120

Bodyguard 2.0 Complete Carry System:

• Pistol: $400
• Sights: $0 (included)
• IWB holster: $70
• Pocket holster: $40
• Four magazines total (2 additional): $70
• Magazine extension not needed (12-round included)
• 1,000 rounds practice ammo: $300
• 200 rounds defensive ammo: $180
• Total: $1,060

Complete system costs prove nearly equivalent despite the Bodyguard's lower pistol price—ammunition costs offset initial savings. The G43 requires sight upgrades the Bodyguard avoids; the Bodyguard's ammunition premium costs $80-100 more for equivalent round counts. Both systems establish for approximately $1,000-1,100 fully equipped and trained.

Final Verdict Matrix: Choose Between the Glock 43 vs Bodyguard 2.0

Use Case	Winner	Why	Confidence Level
First-Time CCW	Bodyguard 2.0	Manageable recoil encourages practice essential for new shooters; higher capacity provides confidence buffer; ready-to-carry factory setup eliminates upgrade confusion; soft-shooting nature prevents flinching during training	High
True Pocket Carry	Bodyguard 2.0	Genuine pocket dimensions and 10-ounce weight enable comfortable all-day pocket carry; 0.76" shorter length and 0.18" narrower width fit standard pants pockets; eight-ounce lighter weight reduces pocket sag and clothing distortion	High
Belt/IWB Carry	Glock 43	Additional weight aids recoil control for rapid strings; 9mm terminal performance matches duty ammunition; slimness enables appendix carry; established holster ecosystem provides more choices; longer sight radius improves practical accuracy	High
High-Volume Training	Glock 43	9mm ammunition costs $70-100 less per 1,000 rounds; proven reliability through 5,000+ round counts; extensive aftermarket enables customization experimentation; ammunition availability and variety support diverse training	High
Backup Gun (LE)	Glock 43	9mm caliber maintains primary duty ammunition compatibility; familiar Glock controls reduce training requirements; department armorer familiarity aids support; single-stack simplicity reduces malfunction variables	High
Backup Gun (Civilian)	Bodyguard 2.0	10-12 round capacity rivals primary carry guns; extremely light weight for ankle or pocket backup; soft recoil enables accurate fire even from awkward backup positions; compact dimensions allow multiple carry method options	High
Recoil-Sensitive Shooter	Bodyguard 2.0	Softer .380 ACP recoil reduces hand fatigue and flinching; manageable impulse encourages practice; improved trigger and sights enable accuracy without fighting painful recoil; pleasant shooting experience builds confidence	High
Terminal Performance Priority	Glock 43	9mm delivers superior terminal ballistics with wider hollow-point selection; greater penetration depth and energy transfer; wider FBI-tested ammunition choices; maintains effectiveness through barriers better than .380	High
Budget-Conscious Trainer	Glock 43	Despite higher initial cost with sight upgrades, cheaper 9mm ammunition saves $350-500 over five years of moderate training; lower magazine costs aid building training inventory; stronger resale value protects investment	Medium
Maximum Capacity Priority	Bodyguard 2.0	10+1 standard or 12+1 extended doubles G43 capacity; 67-100% more ammunition on board provides substantial psychological and practical advantage; rivals micro 9mm capacity while maintaining pocket dimensions	High

Conclusion

The Glock 43 versus Bodyguard 2.0 decision represents a choice between proven 9mm capability and modern pocket-pistol innovation. Neither represents compromise—both excel within their design parameters. The G43 delivers Glock's legendary reliability and 9mm terminal performance in a slim package requiring sight upgrades but offering extensive customization potential and cheaper long-term ammunition costs. The Bodyguard 2.0 provides dramatically improved pocket-pistol shootability with doubled capacity, excellent factory features, and genuinely comfortable recoil characteristics accepting .380 ACP trade-offs and premium ammunition pricing.

Your decision distills to three fundamental questions:

Do you need true pocket carry capability or belt carry suffices? If genuine pocket carry in pants (not jacket pockets) matters, the Bodyguard 2.0's eight-ounce lighter weight and smaller dimensions prove decisive.

If belt carry works for your lifestyle, the G43's superior terminal performance justifies accepting slightly larger dimensions and weight.

Can you manage snappy micro 9mm recoil enough to train regularly? If recoil tolerance and hand strength enable comfortable 50-100 round practice sessions with the G43, its 9mm ballistics provide meaningful defensive advantages.

If sharp recoil discourages practice or causes flinching, the Bodyguard 2.0's softer impulse creates more valuable training tool despite caliber limitations.

How do ammunition costs affect your five-year training budget? For shooters firing 1,000+ rounds annually, the G43's cheaper 9mm ammunition saves $350-500 over five years despite higher initial cost.

For those shooting 500 or fewer rounds yearly, total costs equalize making caliber and shootability preferences more relevant than economic considerations.

Neither choice disappoints serious users. The Glock 43 serves as the proven answer for maximum concealment with 9mm power—accepting capacity limitations and upgrade requirements for terminal performance and ecosystem advantages. T

The Bodyguard 2.0 rewards those valuing pocket carry capability, high capacity, and pleasant shooting experiences—accepting .380 ACP trade-offs for genuine micro-compact dimensions and manageable recoil.

Both represent best-in-class solutions for their respective design philosophies—your specific priorities determine which philosophy serves you better.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What are the main differences between the Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 and Glock 43?

The Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 is lighter, slimmer, and chambered in .380 ACP with an integrated laser sight, making it ideal for deep concealment. The Glock 43 is slightly larger, chambered in 9mm Luger, offering better ballistic performance and versatility for training or self-defense.

2. Which pistol is better for beginners?

The Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 is often recommended for beginners due to its lightweight design, manageable recoil, and external manual safety that adds an extra layer of protection during concealed carry.

3. Is the Glock 43 suitable for daily concealed carry?

Yes, the Glock 43 is a great option for daily concealed carry thanks to its compact size, ergonomic grip, reliable Safe Action trigger system, and moderate weight that balances stability with comfort.

4. Does the Bodyguard’s integrated laser sight improve accuracy?

Yes, the integrated laser sight on the Bodyguard enhances close-range accuracy by providing a clear aiming point in low-light conditions or high-stress situations.

5. Can I customize either firearm?

Both firearms offer customization options; however, the Glock 43 has more extensive aftermarket support for accessories like extended magazines, upgraded sights, and holsters compared to the Bodyguard.

6. Which gun has less recoil?

The Smith & Wesson Bodyguard produces less felt recoil due to its .380 ACP caliber and lightweight frame, making it easier to handle for new shooters or those sensitive to recoil.

7. How does magazine capacity compare between these pistols?

Both pistols have a standard magazine capacity of six rounds; however, aftermarket extensions are widely available for the Glock 43 to increase capacity if needed.

8. Are there specific holster recommendations for these guns?

For deep concealment of the Bodyguard, pocket or appendix-specific holsters work well. For the Glock 43, OWB (Outside-the-Waistband) or IWB (Inside-the-Waistband) holsters provide excellent accessibility while maintaining comfort.

9. Which pistol offers faster draw speed?

The compact size of the Bodyguard allows quick presentation from concealed positions like pockets or appendix carry setups. However, experienced carriers may find faster deployment with the Glock's ergonomic design and streamlined Safe Action trigger system.

10. Should I choose based on caliber preference alone?

Caliber should be one factor among many when choosing a pistol. Consider other aspects such as concealability, ergonomics, shooting experience level, intended use case (e.g., self-defense vs training), and personal comfort before deciding.